|
An advertiser suffered much from substitution. He said, "Look out for
substitutes," "Be sure you get this brand," etc., with no effect. Those were selfish
appeals.
Then he said, "Try our rivals' too" - said it in his headlines. He invited
comparisons and showed that he did not fear them. That corrected the situation. Buyers
were careful to get the brand so conspicuously superior that its maker could court a trial
of the rest.
Two advertisers offered food products nearly identical. Both offered a full-size package. A
coupon was good at any store for a package, for which the maker paid retail price.
The first advertiser failed and the second succeeded. The first even lost a large part of
the trade he had. He cheapened his product by giving a 15-cent package away. It is hard
to pay for an article which has once been free. It is like paying railroad fare after
travelling on a pass.
The other gained added respect for his article by paying retail price to let the user try it.
An article good enough for the maker to buy is good enough for the user to buy. It is
vastly different to pay 15 cents to let you try an article than to simply say "It's free."
So with sampling. Hand an unwanted product to a housewife and she pays it slight
respect. She is in no mood to see its virtues. But get her to ask for a sample after
reading your story, and she is in a very different position.
She knows your claims. She is interested in them, else she would not act. And she
expects to find the qualities you told.
Previous Page -
Back to Table of Contents -
Next Page
|