|
That is what mail order advertisers do - try out plan after plan to constantly reduce the
cost. Why should any general advertiser be less business-like and careful?
Another service of the test campaign is this:
An advertiser is doing mediocre advertising. A skilled advertising agent feels that he can greatly increase results. The advertiser is doubtful. He is doing fairly well. He has alliances which he hesitates to break. So he is
inclined to let well enough alone.
Now the question can be submitted to the verdict of a test. The new agent may take a
few towns, without interfering with the general campaign. Then compare his results with
the general results and prove his greater skill.
Plausible arguments are easy in this line. One man after another comes to an advertiser
to claim superior knowledge or ability. It is hard to decide, and decisions may be wrong.
Now actual figures gained at a small cost can settle the question definitely. The
advertiser makes no commitment. It is like saying to a salesman, "Go out for a week and
prove yourself." A large percentage of all the advertising done would change hands if this
method were applied.
Again we come back to scientific advertising. Suppose a chemist would say in an
arbitrary way that this compound was best, or that better. You would little respect his
opinion. He makes tests - sometimes hundreds of tests - to actually know which is best.
He will never state a supposition before he has proved it. How long before advertisers in
general will apply that exactness to advertising?
Previous Page -
Back to Table of Contents -
Next Page
|